現在位置首頁 > 博碩士論文 > 詳目
論文中文名稱:多媒體電腦輔助教學對高職生英語學習成效之研究 [以論文名稱查詢館藏系統]
論文英文名稱:A Study of the Effects of Multimedia Computer -Assisted Instruction on [以論文名稱查詢館藏系統]
院校名稱:臺北科技大學
學院名稱:人文與社會科學學院
系所名稱:應用英文系碩士班
畢業學年度:103
畢業學期:第二學期
中文姓名:葉慧楓
英文姓名:Hui-Feng Yeh
研究生學號:100548514
學位類別:碩士
語文別:英文
指導教授中文名:洪媽益
指導教授英文名:Michael Tanangkingsing
口試委員中文名:賀一平 ; 董幸正
口試委員英文名:I-Peng Ho ; Hsing-Cheng Tung
中文關鍵詞:多媒體電腦輔助教學策略、互動多媒體、資訊科技融入教學
英文關鍵詞:MCAI Strategy, Interactive Multimedia,
論文中文摘要:現今電腦被視為是教育媒介,它能傳遞教學內容與活動。電腦與數位化科技讓學習者在多媒體環境下閱讀文本,提供其視覺與聽覺的圖像及語料輸入。本文旨在探討多媒體電腦輔助教學策略對高職生英語字彙習得及閱讀理解力的效益。本實驗教學研究採用等組準實驗研究法,以隨機方式挑選二個班級共四十八位高職生為研究對象,隨機分配成實驗組(接受運用多媒體輔助教學策略進行教學)與對照組(採用傳統講述教學方式進行教學)。利用前測與教學實驗後立即後測來蒐集資料。施測所得資料運用描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定以及皮爾森積差相關等統計方式進行分析,來檢測兩組學生英語學習成效之情形。研究資料經由量化及質性的分析,研究結果顯示:(1)在英語閱讀理解學習成就上,實驗組表現顯著優於對照組。(2)在英語字彙習得學習成就上,實驗組表現較優於對照組。(3)學生的字彙能力及閱讀理解能力具有顯著的正相關。字彙能力越強,越能增加對文章的閱讀理解能力。(4)實驗結果證實多媒體電腦輔助教學策略能有效提升學生英語字彙及閱讀能力的效益。鼓勵教師適當善用多媒體輔助教學策略來提升學習成就及動機。結果可歸納出,學生經由多媒體電腦輔助教學策略在單字學習及閱讀理解上能發揮較大效益。此研究在教育上的意涵、研究限制和對未來研究的建議也於文中進行探討。
論文英文摘要:Computers are regarded nowadays as an educational medium in which the computer delivers instructional content or activities. Multimedia Computer-Assisted Instruction (MCAI), with its ability to incorporate sound, visuals, and interactivity, provides a multimedia and interactive learning environment that enhances the teaching and learning process. The emergence of computerization and digitalization makes possible text reading in a multimedia context, which provides an audio and visual language input. This study aims to explore the effects of MCAI strategy on vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension of EFL students in Taiwan.
This study was conducted using an equivalent quasi-experimental research design with 48 vocational high student participants. They were recruited and randomly designated as either the experimental group or the control group. The first class adopted the MCAI strategy, while the second received traditional teacher-driven instruction. The obtained data were analyzed by statistical methods, including descriptive statistics, independent t-test, and Pearson’s product-moment correlation. The data were analyzed in two ways - quantitative and qualitative analyses.
Results of the study revealed: (1) The experimental group performed significantly better than the control group in the English reading comprehension tests. (2) In English vocabulary tests, the experimental group performed better than the control group. (3) The students’ vocabulary achievement had a significantly positive correlation with their reading comprehension achievement. (4) The study provides references to encourage teachers to bring some appropriate interactive multimedia programs into the classroom to enhance students’ English learning performance and motivation.
論文目次:Table of Contents
Chinese Abstract..i
Abstract..ii
Acknowledgements..iii
List of Tables..iv
List of Figures..v
Table of Contents..vi
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION..1
1.1 Background and Motivation..2
1.2 Purpose of the Study..4
1.3 Research Questions..5
1.4 Significance of the Study..6
1.5 Definitions of Terms..7
1.6 Organization of the Thesis..10
Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW..11
2.1 Traditional Instruction..11
2.2 Multimedia Computer-Assisted Instruction..13
2.2.1 Strengths of MCAI..14
2.2.2 Weaknesses of MCAI..15
2.3 Theoretical Framework..16
2.3.1 Dale’s Cone of Experience..16
2.3.2 Dual-coding Theory of Multimedia learning..18
2.3.3 Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning..19
2.3.4 Summary and Comparison the Theories..23
2.4 Visual and Verbal Effects on Multimedia Learning..23
2.4.1 Effects of Multimedia on Vocabulary Learning..25
2.4.2 Effects of Multimedia on Reading Comprehension..26
2.5 Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary..27
2.6 Recent Findings on the Effects of MCAI..28
Chapter 3 METHODOLOGY..33
3.1 Subjects..33
3.2 Instruments..37
3.2.1 Teaching Materials..37
3.2.2 Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension Tests..45
3.2.3 Questionnaire..46
3.3 Procedures..47
3.4 Data Analysis..52
Chapter 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..55
4.1 Test Data and Statistical Analysis..55
4.2 Discussion of Test Result..59
4.3 Analysis of the Questionnaire..60
4.4 Discussion of Answers to Questionnaire..68
Chapter 5 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS..72
5.1 Summary of the Major Findings..72
5.2 Pedagogical Implications..74
5.3 Limitations of the Study..78
5.4 Suggestions for Future Research..79
References..81
Appendices..91
論文參考文獻:References:
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Technology in testing: The present and the future. System, 28(4), 593-603.
Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implication (5th ed.). New York: Freeman.
Aust, R., Kelley, M. J., & Roby W. (1993). The use of hyper-reference and conventional dictionaries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 63-73.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
Baumann, J. F. (2009). Vocabulary and reading comprehension: The nexus of meaning. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 323-346). New York, NY: Routledge.
Beatty, K. (2013). Teaching and Researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Beauvois, M. H. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities. 28, 177-190.
Bello, T. (1999). New avenues to choosing and using videos. TESOL Matters, 9(4), 20.
Bernard, R. M. (1990). Using extended captions to improve learning from instructional illustrations. British Journal of Educational Technology. 21, 215-225.
Blair, T. R., Rupley, W. H., & Nichols, W. D. (2007). The effective teacher of reading: Considering the “what” and “how” of instruction. The Reading Teacher, 60(5), 432-438.
Bracey, G. (1982). Computers in education: What the research shows. Electronic Learning, 2, 51-54.
Brett, P. (1998). Using multimedia: A descriptive investigation of incidental language
learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(2), 179-200.
Bri, D., Garcia, M., Col., H., Lloret, J., & Vera, C. (2009). A study of Virtual Learning Environments in WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 1(5), 1790-1979.
Brown, J. D. (1998). An EFL readability index. JALT Journal, 20, 7-36.
Buzzetto, N. A. (2007). Advanced principles of effective e-learning. California: Informing Science.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognitive and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741-753.
Christmann, E., Badjett, J., & Lucking, R. (1997). Microcomputer-based computer-assisted instruction within differing subject areas: A statistical deduction. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 16(3), 281-296.
Church, D.M. (1986). Textbook specific computer exercises for elementary French students. Modern Language Journal, 70, 251-257.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational
Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-170.
Dale, E. (1946). Audiovisual Methods in Teaching, 1st ed. N.Y.:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Dale, E. (1972). Vocabulary development: A neglected phase of reading instruction. Annual Convention of International Reading Association.
Danan, M. (1992). Reversed subtitling and dual coding theory: New directions for foreign language instruction. Language Learning, 42, 497-527.
Davis, J. N., & Lyman-Hager, M. (1997) Computers and L2 reading: Student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 58-72.
Davis, R. (2006). Utopia or chaos? The impact of technology on language teaching. The Internet TESL Journal. No.12(11).
Dunkel, P. (1999). Considerations in developing or using second/foreign language proficiency computer-adaptive tests. Language Learning and Technology, 2(2), 77-93.
Eshani, F., & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning and Technology, 2(1), 45-60.
Fincher, L., & Wright, K. E. (1996). Use of computer-assisted instruction in athletic training education. Journal of Athletic Training, 31, 44-49.
Fisher, G. (1983). Where CAI is effective: A summary of the research. Electronic Learning, 3, 82, 84.
Gildea, P., Miller, G.A., & Wurtenberg, C.L. (1990). Contextual enrichment by videodisc. In Don Nix & Rand Spiro (eds.). Cognition, education, multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology.
Glenberg, A. H., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129-151.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading: Applied linguistics in action. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Haastrup, K. (1991). Lexical inferencing procedures, or, talking about words: Receptive procedures in foreign language learning with special reference to English. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen.
Harvey, B. M. & Mazzeo, K. (1989). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional education and psychological tests. Los Angeles: College Entrance Examination Board.
Hill, D. R., & Thomas, H. R. (1998). Survey review. ELT Journal, 42(1), 44-52.
Hsu L., & Sheu, C. M. (2008). A study of Low English Proficiency Students’ Attitude toward Online Learning. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 240-264.
Hudson, R., Pullen, P., Lane, H., & Torgesen, J. (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 4-32.
Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “Short Circuit” in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1-31.
Joshi, R. (2005). Vocabulary: A Critical Component of Comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 209-219.
John, M. (1995). Multimedia-why and why not. The Computing Teacher
Johnson, R.T. (1988). Structuring Cooperative Learning. New York: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, R.T., Johnson, D.W., & Stanne, M.B. (1986). Comparison of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 382-392.
Kaivanpanah, S., & Alavi, S. M. (2008). The role of linguistic knowledge in word-meaning inference. System, 36(2), 172-195.
Kellogg, G. S., & Howe, M. J. A. (1971). Using words and pictures in foreign language learning. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 17, 87-94.
Kern, Richard. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Knowles, L. (2009). Differentiated instruction in reading: Easier than it looks! School Library Media Activities Monthly, XXV(5), 26-28.
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Koskela, M., Kiltti P., Vilpola, I., & Tevonen, J. (2005). Suitability of a Virtual Learning Environment of Higher Education. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning,. 3(1), 21-30.
Kulik, C.C., & Kulik, J.A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An
updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7(1-2), 75-94.
Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C., & Bangert-Drowns, L. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 59-74.
Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482.
Lamb, M. (2004). “It Depends on the Students Themselves”: Independent Language
Learning at an Indonesian State School. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17, (3) 229-245.
Lee, L. (1998). Going beyond classroom learning:Acquiring cultural knowledge via online newspapers and intercultural exchanges via on-line chat rooms. CALICO Journal, 16(2), 101-120.
LeLoup, J.W., & Ponterio, R. (2005). On The Net Vocabulary Support for Independent
Online Reading. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 3-7.
Lepper, M. R., Sethi, S., Dialdin, D., & Drake, M. (1997). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A developmental perspective. In S. S. Luthar, J. A. Burack, D. Cicchetti, & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental psychology: Perspectives on adjustment, risk, and disorder (pp. 23-50). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mandl, H., & Levin, J. R. (1989). Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Manlder, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrances of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to prose comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19, 30-42.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3). 389-401.
Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 31-44.
McNamara. D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Physiological Press.
Meskill, C. (1996). Listening Skills Development through Multimedia. Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, vol. 5(2), 179-201.
Mills, R. & Tait, A. (1999). The Convergence of Distance and Conventional Education: Patterns of Flexibility for the Individual Learner. London: Routledge.
Mohanty, P. C. (2008). Mass Media & Education. New York: APH Publishing.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology 91:358-368.
Nation, P., & Coady, J. (1998). Vocabulary and reading. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and langauge teaching (pp. 97-110). New York: Longman.
Nunan, D. 1992. Research Methods in Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nuttall, C. (1996) Teaching Reading Skills in a foreign language (New Edition) Oxford, Heinemann
Oakley, G. & Jay, J. (2008). “Making time” for reading: Factors that influence the success of multimedia reading in the home. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 246-255.
Omaggio, A. C. (1979). Pictures and second language comprehension: Do they help? Foreign Language Annals, 12, 107-116.
Omaggio, H. A. (1993). Teaching Language in Context. (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, R. & D. Crookall. (1990). (eds.) Simulation, Gaming, and Language Learning. New York: Newbury House.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A., & Desrochers, A. (1980). A dual-coding approach to bilingual memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 388-399.
Paivio, A., & Lambert, W. (1981). Dual coding and bilingual memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 532-539.
Penni, T., & Niki, D. (1998). International multimedia for teaching education.
Information Services & Use, 18, 87.
Plass, J., Chun, D., Mayer, R., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36.
Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536.
Read, J. (2010). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.
Rieber, L. P. (1990). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 135-140.
Rieber, L. P. (1991). Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 318-328.
Robinson, L. (2003). For the love of books: Expanding e-books and audio books in school libraries. Media & Methods, 40(2), 6-12.
Saettler, P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Salaberry, M. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85 (1), 39.
Scardamalia, A., (1989). Computer-supported Intentional Learning Environment, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1) 51-68.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schnotz, W., & Kulhavy, R. (1990). Comprehension of graphics. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science, 183, 482-488.
Snow, C. E. & Sweet, A. P. (2003). Reading for comprehension. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 1-11). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89-106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sultan, A., & Marshall, J. (1995). The effects of computer visual appeal on learners’ motivation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 391488)
Swaffar, Janet, & Katherine Arens. (2005). Remapping the Foreign Language Curriculum: An Approach through Multiple Literacies. New York: Modern Language Association.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Acer Press.
Taylor, B., Mraz, M., Nichols, W., Rickelman, R., & Wood, K. (2009). Using explicit instruction to promote vocabulary learning for struggling readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25, 2(3), 205-220.
Taylor, R. (1980). The Computer in the School: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward a differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 12.
Underwood, J. (1989). HyperCard and interactive video. CALICO, 6, 7-20.
Vaughan, T. (2008). Multimedia: making it work (7th Ed.). NY. McGraw-Hill companies Inc.
Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 33-52.
White, B. (1984). Designing computer games to help physics students understand Newton’s laws of motion. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 69-108.
Willows, D. M., Houghton, H. A. (1987). The psychology of illustration: Volume 1. Basic research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Willows, D. M., Houghton, H. A. (1987). The psychology of illustration: Volume 2. Instructional issues. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 211-247.
Writtrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
Xin, J.F. & Rieth, H. (2001). Video-Assisted vocabulary instruction for elementary school students with learning disabilities. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 87-103.
Yang, S. C. & Chen, N. S. (2007). Integrating computer-mediated tools into the language curriculum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 85-9.
論文全文使用權限:不同意授權