現在位置首頁 > 博碩士論文 > 詳目
論文中文名稱:台灣大學生的英語關係子句使用之表現 [以論文名稱查詢館藏系統]
論文英文名稱:A Study on the Competence of Relative Clauses of Taiwanese Undergraduate Students [以論文名稱查詢館藏系統]
院校名稱:臺北科技大學
學院名稱:人文與社會科學學院
系所名稱:應用英文系碩士班
畢業學年度:103
畢業學期:第二學期
中文姓名:蘇怡庭
英文姓名:Yi-Ting Su
研究生學號:102548001
學位類別:碩士
語文別:英文
指導教授中文名:洪媽益
指導教授英文名:Michael Tanangkingsing
口試委員中文名:謝富惠;林東毅;黃希敏
口試委員英文名:Fu-Hui Hsieh;Dong-Yi Lin;Caroline Hwang
中文關鍵詞:關係子句語言普遍性限度短期記憶迴避策略
英文關鍵詞:relative clausesuniversal constraintsshort-term memoryavoidance strategies
論文中文摘要:關係子句一直是語言學習者需要花大量的時間和心力去研習的,也是語言學者長期在研究其複雜結構的原因。同時,關係子句也常運用在口語溝通或是文章陳述,是一個應用範圍相當廣泛的句構。本研究以三個假設為參考,分別是名詞短語可及性層級假設(Noun Phrase Accessibility Hypothesis, NPAH)、感知難度假設 (Perceptual Difficulty Hypothesis, PDH)與SO層級假設 (SO Hierarchy Hypothesis, SOHH)來了解學習者在英語關係子句習得上會受到哪些因素的限制。根據現有文獻顯示,其中因素可能包含語言普遍性限度和人類的短期記憶限制。此外本研究也針對學習者在構成英語關係子句時會採用哪些迴避策略進行分析。本研究的對象為英文本科系的大學生,並以合併句子及文法是非判斷此兩種測驗方式進行。合併句子是用來了解學習者在構成關係子句時最常用的結構為何及迴避策略的使用,並結合10種最常使用的英語關係子句類型:SS, SO, SIO, SOPREP, SGEN, OS, OO,OIO, OOPREP以及OGEN。此研究結果顯示英文本科系大學生普遍GEN類型題目答對率高,DO相對低。在合併句子中,如果句子為OPREP類型時,受試者普遍會迴避,並使用較熟悉的句法;其中也發現重複代名詞較常出現在DO類型的關係子句。整體的作答中,有部分的受試者會刻意迴避鑲嵌式句型,並使用右延伸句型代替。由分析中也發現,過度的訓練困難結構的句子會使學習者在遇到簡單句子時缺乏思考,如果出現看似簡單句型的陷阱題時,也容易判斷錯誤。
論文英文摘要:The present study investigated learners’ acquisition constraints in terms of acquiring English relative clauses. The three predictor hypotheses with distinct theoretical backgrounds are employed as reference materials in the research: Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy (NPAH), Perceptual Difficulty Hypothesis (PDH), and Subject-Object Hierarchy Hypothesis (SOHH). The research was conducted by testing the production of relative clauses among Taiwanese English major undergraduate students with grammaticality judgment task and sentence combination task. The grammaticality judgment task was designed to obtain intuitional data based on learners’ reaction to the task sentences. The sentence combination task contained 10 sentences that was combined with subject and object and generated 10 types of relative clauses to examine the tendency of learners’ production of relative clauses. The results of the study are as follows: First, GEN is the easiest type to understand and DO is the most difficult type for Taiwanese English major undergraduate students. Second, for Taiwanese English major undergraduate students, while center-embedded RCs are not a barrier for them to acquire and/or produce, right-embedded RCs are easier for them to produce and/or access. Third, some subjects tended to switch the order of the two sentences in the examinations when DO, IO and OPREP type of RCs occurs. Fourth, Taiwanese learners of English are influenced by Chinese producing English RCs with resumptive pronouns. In addition, the analysis of the two tasks revealed that over training for using difficult structures may cause learners to answer the questions of simple structures too quickly without thinking too much into it. In other words, if the questions were manipulated by the author and looked like a simple sentence, learners may answer them quickly and choose an incorrect answer.
論文目次:Acknowledgements i
Chinese Abstract iii
Abstract v
Table of Contents vii
List of Tables x
List of Figures xii
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 General Introduction of Relative Clauses 2
1.3 Objectives of the Study 4
1.4 Significance of the Study 5
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 Introduction to English Relative Clauses 7
2.1.1 Definitions 7
2.1.2 English Relative Clause Types 9
2.1.3 Relative Clause in English Conversation 11
2.1.4 Relative Clause in Written English 14
2.2 Contrasts between English and Chinese Relative Clauses 14
2.2.1 Prenominal vs Postnominal Relative Clauses 15
2.2.2 Comparative Study of Relative Markers 16
2.2.3 Differences in terms of Relativized Positions 18
2.2.4 Summary of Similarities and Differences between English and Chinese Relative Clauses 19
2.3 Hypotheses for English Relativization Difficulty 20
2.3.1 Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy Hypothesis (NPAH) 21
2.3.2 Perceptual Difficulty Hypothesis (PDH) 25
2.3.3 Subject-Object Hierarchy Hypothesis (SOHH) 26
2.3.4 Parallel Function Hypothesis (PFH) 29
2.3.5 Summary of the Four Hypotheses on the Order of Difficulty of Relative Clauses 30
2.4 Previous Studies on Processing English Relative Clauses 31
2.4.1 Recognition of Relative Clauses in English 32
2.4.2 Error Analysis 38
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 41
3.1 Research Questions 41
3.2 Subjects 43
3.3 Research Design 44
3.4 Measuring Instruments 45
3.4.1 Grammaticality Judgment Task 46
3.4.2 Sentence Combination Task 47
3.5 Analysis Procedures 48
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 53
4.1 RC Production in Grammaticality Judgment Task and Sentence Combination Task 54
4.1.1 Grammaticality Judgment Task 54
4.1.2 Sentence Combination Task 61
4.1.2.1 Statistical Results 61
4.1.2.2 Discussion of the Production by Each Level 66
4.2 Avoidance Strategies 69
4.3 Analysis of Students’ Compositions 74
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION 79
5.1 The Findings of the Study 80
5.2 The Limitations of the Study 82
5.3 Contributions 82

REFERENCES 84
APPENDIX 93
論文參考文獻:Abdolmanafi, S. J. & Rahmani, Z. (2012). An investigation of the learnability of
relative clauses by EFL learners. World Journal of English Language, 2 (3). 29-37.
Abdolmanafi, S. J. & Rezaee, A. (2012). The Difficulty Hierarchy in the Acquisition of English Relative Clauses by Persian Learners. International Journal of English and Education, 2 (1). 170-179.
Aoun, J., & Li, Y. H. (2003). Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature
of Grammar: The Diversity of Wh-Constructions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Azar, B.S. (1999). Understanding and using English grammar. New York: Pearson Education.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1994). Corpus-based approaches to issues in
applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 169-189.
Brown, H. D. (1971). Children’s comprehension of relativized English sentences. Child
Development 42.6:1923–1936.
Cai, J. T. & Wu, Y. A. (2006). The accessibility hierarchy in Chinese relative clauses acquisition. Modern Foreign Languages, 29(4). 382-391.
Cann, R., Kaplan, T. & Kempson, R. (2005). Data at the grammar-pragmatics interface:
The case of resumptive pronouns in English. Lingua, 115, 1551-1577.
Celce-Murcia, M & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book. USA: Heinle &
Heinle Publishers.
Chafe, W. (1979). Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of
view. In N. L. Charles (Ed.), Subject and topic, (pp. 25-55). New York: Academic Press.
Chafe, W. (1980). The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative. In W. Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories, (pp. 9-50). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (Ed.),
Coherence and grounding in discourse, (pp. 21-51). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Chen, J. J. (2004). A study on relative clauses in Taiwanese EFL students’ writing.
Master’s Thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Chou, Y.H. (2006). Acquisition of English relative clauses by Taiwan EFL college
students. MA thesis, National Sun Yet-Sen University.
Comrie, B. (1983). Language Universal and Linguistic Typology. Basil Blackwell.
Cook, V. (1993). Linguistics and Second Language Acquistion. New York: St. Martin’s
Press.
Cook, V. (1996). Second Language Learning And Language Teaching. New York:
Arnold.
Cui, Y. Q. (2013). L2 processing of relative clauses in Mandarin. Arizona Working
Papers in SLA & Teaching, 20, 20-39.
Dai, Y. C. (2010). Hanyu zuowei dier yuyan de guanxi congju xide nandu diaocha [An investigation of the relative clause acquisition by learners of Chinese as a second language]. Journal of Ocean University of China (Social Sciences), 5, 85-91.
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language acquisition instruction does make a difference:evidence from an empirical study of SL relativazation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of relative clause and noun. In: M. S. Dryer, & M.
Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from http://wals.info/chapter/90
Du Bois, J. W. (1980). Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In W.
Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories (pp. 302-374). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dulay, H. & Burt, M. (1977). Remarks on creativity in language acquisition. In M. Burt,
H. Dulay, & M. Finnochiaro (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language. New York: Regents.
Eckman, F. (1991). The structural conformity hypothesis and the acquisition of consonant clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, 23-41.
Eckman, F. R., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition English as a second language. Applied Linguistics,
9(1), 1-20.
Ellis, R. (1996). The Study of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2003). The study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: a psychometric study. SSLA, 27, 141-172.
Flanigan, B. O. (1995). Anaphora and relativization in child second language
acquisition. SSLA, 17, 331-351.
Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (1990). A discourse explanation of the grammar of
relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66(2), 297-316.
Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2007). Relative clauses in English conversation: Relativizers, frequency, and the notion of construction, Studies in Language, 31, 291-326.
Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29(2), 327-344.
Gass, S. (1980). An investigation of syntactic transfer in adult second language learners.
In R. Scarcella, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Selected papers from the Los Angeles second language acquisition research forum (pp. 132-141). Rowley, M.A., Newbury House.
Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In M. Hines, & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL ’81:Selected papers from the fifteenth annual conference of teachers of English to speakers of other languages (pp. 129-139). Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course
(2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Greenbaum, S., & Quirk, R. (1999). A student's grammar of the English language.England: Pearson Education.
Hamilton, R. L. (1994). Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Language Learning, 44, 123-157.
Hsin, A. L. & Wang, M. J. (2005). The order of difficulty in relative clause learning for
Chinese EFL students. English Teaching and Learning, 29, 61-84.
Houng, C. C.-L. H. (1986). The relative clause construction in Chinese: Noun phrase
accessibility and other issues. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin.
Hyltenstam, K. (1984). The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in
second language acquisition: the case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 39-60). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Hyltenstam, K. (1987). Markedness, language universals, language typology, and
second language acquisition (pp, 55-78). In C. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Hyltenstam, K. (1990). Typological markedness as a research tool in the study of second language acquisition. In H. Dechert (Ed.). Current trends in European second language acquisition research. Philadelphia : Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Ioup, G.. (1983). Acquiring complex sentences in ESL. In M. B. Kathleen, H. L. Michael, & P. Sabrina (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies, (pp. 41-55), Rowley, Mass: Newbury House Publishers.
Ioup, G., & Kruse, A. (1977). Interference versus structural complexity in second language acquisition: language universals as a basis for natural sequencing. In H. D.Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. H. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ‘77: Teaching and learning English as a second language: trends in research and practice. Washington, D. C.: TESOL.
Izumi, S. (2000). Promoting noticing and SLA: An empirical study of the effects of output and input enhancement on ESL relativization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Izumi, S. (2003). Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative
clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 53(2),
285-323.Jones, A. (1991). ‘Review of studies on the acquisition of relative clauses in English’. Unpublished paper, Tokyo: Temple University Japan.
Keenan, E. (1975). Variation in universal grammar. In Fasold, R. W., and Shuy, R. W.
(eds.). Analyzing variation in language : papers from the Second Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Washington : Georgetown University Press.
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry. 8(1), 63-99.
Keenan, E. & Comrie. (1979). Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Language, 55 (3), 649-664.
Keenan, E. & Hawkins, J. (1987). The psychological validity of the accessibility
hierarchy. In E. Keenan (ed.), Universal Grammar: 15 Essays, 60-85. London:
Croom Helm.
Kleinmann, H. H. (1977). Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition.
Language Learning. 27, 1. 93-107.
Kuno, S. (1974). The position of relative clauses and conjunctions. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 113-157.
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. (1994). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. New York: Longman Inc.
Lehmann, C. (1986). On the typology of relative clauses. Linguistics, 24, 663-80.
Lin, C. C. (2007). A study on the use of English relative clauses by Taiwanese senior
high school students. Master Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.
Lin, C. J. (2008). The processing foundation of head-final relative clauses. Language and Linguistics, 9(4), 813-838.
Liu, J. Y. (2006). The acquisition of written English relative clauses by Taiwanese
learners. Master Thesis. Providence University.
Liu, M. Y. (1999). An experimental study of English relative clauses by Chinese junior
high school students in Taiwan. Master Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.
Lock, G. (1996). Functional English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maxwell, D. (1979). Strategies of relativization and Np accessibility. Language, 55, 352-371.
Murphy, R. (2004). English grammar in use: A self-study reference and practice book
for intermediate students (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nakayama, M. (1996). Sentence processing. In N. Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 398-424. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Odlin, T. (1989). Language Transfer: Cross-linguistic Influence in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Grady, W.; Lee, M. & Choo, M. (2003). A subject-object asymmetry in the
acquisition of relatives clauses in Korean as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 433-448.
Olofsson, A. (1981). Relative junctions in written American English. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Studies in English, 50.
Ozeki, H., & Shirai, Y. (2007) Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the
difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 169-196.
Packard, J. L. (2008). Relative clause processing in L2 speakers of Mandarin and
English. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 43(2), 107–146.
Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal modes, and relative clause formation in a
formal and an informal context. SSLA, 8, 38-55.
Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In C. Peter (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 223-255). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Rasinger, S. M. (2013). Quantitative research in linguistics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (2007). Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence, Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 1-23.
Roberts, M. A. (2000). Implicational Markedness and the Acquisition of Relativization
by Adult Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa dissertation.
Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24, 205-214.
Schachter, J., Tyson, A. F., & Diffley, F. J. (1976). Learner intuitions of grammaticality. Language Learning, 26, 67-76.
Schumann, J. H. (1980). The acquisition of English relative clauses by second language learners. In R. Scarcella, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp. 118-131). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Sharwood Smith, M. and Kellerman, E. (1986). Introduction. In E. Kellerman, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.). Cross linguistic influence in second language acquisition (pp.1-9). Great Britain: Wheaton & Co. Ltd., Exeter.
Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272-281.
Taghvaipour, M. (2005). Persian relative clauses in head-driven phrase structure
grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex.
Tang, T. C. (1979). Studies in Chinese Syntax and Semantics. Taipei: Studentbook.
Tang, C. X, & Xu, J. J. (2011). ‘The acquisition order of English relative clauses by Chinese senior high school students: a mixed-design study’. Foreign Language
Teaching and Research , 1, 96-108.
Tarallo, F & Myhill, J. (1983). Interference and natural language processing in second
language acquisition. Language Learning, 33, 55-76.
Wu, K.H. (2013). Syntactic and semantic effects on English relative clause acquisition:
an investigation of Taiwanese senior high school students. MA thesis, National
Chung Cheng University.
Xu, Y. (2011). The accessibility hierarchy in Chinese relative clauses. Unpublished
paper, University of Pittsburgh.
Xu, Y. (2012). On psycholinguistic and acquisition studies of relative clauses: an interdisciplinary and cross-linguistic perspective. Contemporary Foreign
Languages Studies, 12, 62–85.
Xu, Y. (2014). Evidence of the accessibility hierarchy in relative clauses in Chinese as a second language. Language and Linguistics, 15(3), 435-464.
Zhang, X. R., (2007). Resumptive pronouns in the acquisition of English relative
clauses by Chinese EFL learners. Doctoral dissertation, The Chinese University of
Hong Kong.
Zhang, L. (2007). The two positions of Chinese relative clauses. University of South Carolina.
論文全文使用權限:同意授權於2018-07-31起公開